Comparing and Contrasting Four Leadership Models and Theories

The following radical outlines the comparison and contrast of four channelise models and theories. The purpose of this paper is to acquaint readers with the basic concepts underlying from to each one one model and speculation. A re stack of the scholarly studies on lead shows that there is a wide manikin of divers(prenominal) hypothetical approaches to explain the complexities of the leadinghip process (e.g., Bass, 1990; Bryman, 1992; Gardner, 1990; Hickman 1998; Rost, 1991). Some searchers expect as a trait, or as behavior, while others view leaders from a political perspective, or from a humane viewpoint. The paper begins with a description of leadership trait theory, a theory that concerns itself solely with leader characteristics. Following this, two theories be reviewed. They be: transactional leadership and misadventure approach to leadership. The paper concludes with a compute at transformational leadership. Although these leadership theories or models could be considered contingency models, they are addressed separately because of the emphasis that they place on religion and follower development. Trait TheoryIn the early 1900s, leadership traits were analyze to acquire what made certain people owing(p) leaders. The theories that were developed were called, ? dandy man? theories because they focused on identifying the innate qualities and characteristics possessed by great social, political, and military leaders (e.g. Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and Mohandas Gandhi).

It was believed that people were innate(p) with these traits and just now ?great? people posses sed them. During this time research diffi! cult on determining the specific traits that clearly severalise leaders from followers (Bass, 1990; Jago, 1982). Although different researchers identified a variety of leadership traits and characteristics, it is generally thought that there are tailfin analyze leadership traits: intelligence, self-confidence, determination, integrity, and sociability. In the mid-1900s, the trait approach was challenged by research that questioned the universality of leadership traits. In a major review... If you penury to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper