Confidentiality and Informed Consent

In the article by Martindale, Chambers, and Thompson, we learn that communicate consent and confidentiality. A mortal should be informed of their right to confidentiality and the manipulation they atomic number 18 consenting to in the therapeutic relationship. This study Is foretokenifi keistertly closely-valuable because we are shown that in that respect has been not very much previous inquiry done on how substantially we manage consent, how Informed the patient Is, how unsophisticated they are, and what they actually shaft about the policies of the impartr. Professionals in many another(prenominal) settings create and apply very ifferent techniques of informed consent and confidentiality.In professions where professionals constantly see concourse who are troubled. who see the ever moveing devastation of grief, pain, and the disparities of people in situations that they stackt change, it can be very taxing and wearing on even the most seasoned professional person, but do we actually communicate well to the patient that they deport rights? In the article, we see that so many patients are so desperate to receive bearing that they Instantly Just sign papers so that the can see the psychologist.If a patient Is that esperate, how do we bonk that mental health professionals are performing to their maximum standards of communicate the patient about their complaint standards and things like who has the appropriate access to their medical exam information? We, as pleader psychology graduate students and professionals alike, have a strong moral and ethical responsibility to ourselves, our colleagues. and our lymph nodes to make sure that we provide appropriate documentation, informing the patients all the way of their rights and responsibilities, so that we do not potentially negatively affect the lives of other eople.In the article by Martindale, Chambers, and Thompson, In the quaternion themes that emerge, being referred the participants fe elings, mental health demandingies, and their Impact relationships with workers and carers and autonomy (Martindale et al, p. 355), we see that many clients have concerns about continuing care. I think the most difficult and problematic Issue to traveling bag there Is the patients mental health and stability. In chapter 5 of the textbook, the ACA Code of Ethics, Section 8. 5. on informed consent states certificate of indebtedness to Clients.When counseling minor clients or adult clients who lack the capacity to tip over voluntary, Informed consent, counselors protect he confidentiality of information received in the counseling relationship as specified by federal and state laws, written policies, and applicable ethical standards. (Welfel, 2012, p. 142). It is the professional responsibility of the provider to be aware(predicate) that the client has good mental standing to be able to know their rights. However, how dowe know upon first seeing the client that they are In a good mental standing to be completely informed? This puts providers in a tough situation.What happens to the clients they counsel who never know of their consent rights and their confidentiality? How can we test for that if it we have no idea if the client is being unsophisticated with us? How do we know the frequency of occurrence? How do we know It Is not happening all the time? That Is why It is absolutely dictatorial to have open and t Of2 nonest communlcatlons wlt n tne cllent as oTten as posslDle. As graduate students, It is important for us to foster a supportive operative relationship with our advisor, so hat we are absolutely sure the client is informed about what comes next in their therapy process.What if clients are too excite to ask how many sittings they have left? What if they are a yes person and cant say no to more or less treatment options? What if they have concerns but are too scared to ask about what is approaching? I have personally seen a therapist who, after all session, had me fill out a questionnaire about my ability to see things clearly in the session if I understood what my objectives were, if I understood her clearly, and if there was anything I was ersonally hesitant to share or anything that bothered me about our last session.This was extremely problematic for me because I always answered no problems with last session for fear that I would disappoint my provider or that she would then institute up the issue that I had experienced a problem with. I always felt uncomfortable, but continued to answer the questionnaires and continue care anyway because I needed it. In Martindale, Chambers, and Thompsons article, there are both(prenominal) limitations to the study. Primarily collected data were from mainly white omen.There seemed to be no measure of marginalized communities, under represented populations, or any data from the people who seem to struggle the most people needing critical care. How would ethnic minorities resolve to a provider who may not understand their cultural differences? How do we make sure those people are being informed befittingly? What about marginalized communities who are in crisis and need care? How do we handle special situations appropriately? What about people who cant consent to appropriate care guidelines?